US District Judge Amit Mehta of Washington. Photo by Diego M. Radzinschi/ALM Oathkeepers Must Face Obstruction, Conspiracy Charges From Capitol Riot, Judge Rules
Judge Amit Mehta rejected arguments from Oathkeepers lawyers challenging the use of an obstruction of an official proceeding charge as it related to the Capitol riot.
December 20, 2021 at 09:08 PM
4 minute read
A federal judge on Monday rejected an attempt by lawyers for the far-right Oathkeepers group to toss out the heart of the federal government's case against them: That they conspired to obstruct Congress' formal certification of the election when they allegedly stormed the Capitol on Jan. 6.
U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta of the District of Columbia ruled that 17 Oathkeepers defendants must face charges of obstruction of an official proceeding and conspiracy to obstruct that proceeding. Mehta rejected arguments that the certification of the electoral college vote didn't qualify as an "official proceeding" and that prosecutors' description of their conduct didn't violate that statute.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Special Counsel Jack Smith Prepares Final Report as Trump Opposes Its Release
4 minute read
Luigi Mangione Charged in Federal Court for Stalking, Murder and Firearms Offenses
Luigi Mangione Indicted on Charges Including First-Degree Murder in Shooting of Health Insurance CEO
Suspected Shooter of UnitedHealthcare CEO Is Charged With Murder in New York. Now What?
Trending Stories
- 1Regulatory Intelligence Platform Abstract Announces $4.8 Million in Seed Funding
- 2Former Sacks Weston Partner Faces 5-Year Suspension Over Mail, Wire Fraud Conviction
- 37th Circ. Revives Transactional Dispute Against Military Retailer, Sends to State Court
- 4Lavish 'Lies' Led to Investors Being Fleeced in Nine-Figure International Crypto Scam
- 5AstraZeneca Files Flurry of Lawsuits to Protect Cancer Treatment Drug
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
