Partners Brace for Capital Markets Slump Following Ukraine Invasion
Partners across Europe say they expect no IPOs for the first half the year, as bond work falters and corporate transactions continue to stall.
March 07, 2022 at 06:58 AM
4 minute read
AnalysisThe original version of this story was published on Law.com International
Partners across London expect IPO work and corporate transactions to dry up across the U.K. and Europe during the first half of this year, as uncertainty around the wider economic impact Russia's invasion of Ukraine grows.
Capital markets has already slowed due to rising inflation, geopolitical tensions and the continuing pandemic. But now the general IPO market "is going to be pretty much closed", said one London Magic Circle partner.
An ECM partner at a large international firm agreed that "the invasion of Ukraine adds significantly to a number of headwinds that have already hit the pipeline".
"We're expecting activity levels over the first half this year to be much lower than those we have seen in the last two years, with most of the pipeline deferred to the second half or beyond."
According to data from Refinitiv, the first two months of 2022 have seen the proceeds of IPO's down 98%, to $93.7 million, compared to the same period last year when the figure stood at $3.9 billion.
Another London partner at a large international firm agreed: "I'm imagining we would see almost no deals in H1. It had largely stopped anyway, this has just made it worse."
Europe saw an IPO boom last year with an extremely busy market delivering the strongest first quarter for European IPOs since 2000.
In the week after the invasion began, there were no IPOs at all in the U.K. or Europe, and only 14 worldwide.
Various IPOs have been postponed, including Burger King and NewDay. Mishcon de Reya had already postponed its IPO due to a volatile market, but some are still expected to go ahead like Olam, the Korean food company.
It has been reported that Burger King was expecting to float this spring, while Olam stated last year it was "preparing for listing by H1 2022″.
"All across the city we're scrambling to work out what we have to do," said one London partner.
The feeling is the same in parts of Europe ,as one Frankfurt partner noted: "IPOs are dead, and will be for a while."
Bonds have also suffered a significant hit as a result of the Russian conflict.
"On the bonds side it is completely pens down. Lawyers are just saying we have to stop and pick this up in a few weeks," said a partner at a large international firm.
It's not just capital markets that are taking a hit; corporate transactions across Europe are too, according to partners.
"Deals are being slowed or halted, and I'm not talking about Ukrainian deals, this is Europe to Europe deals," one of the partners said. "Deals that don't have any Russia or Ukraine components."
Transactional activity has been extremely busy until now. In 2021 European M&A hit a 14 year high with deals totaling $1.4 trillion. February 2022 deal value was down 63% compared to last year—from $31.3 billion to $11.7 billion.
Another Magic Circle London partner described any deals with Russia now as a "blackhole" as they risk putting firms in a vulnerable position.
"We don't know if the counterparty is a counterparty we can accept money from. What if we accept the trade and have delivered securities and then we're left exposed?"
In the U.K. last week there were a total of 34 M&A transactions. The last time the figure was that low was the final week of 2020 at the height of the pandemic.
The partners predict the market may bounce back provided the conflict stays localised.
"If it stays self contained the markets figure out a way around it," said one partner, while another added: "The market could rebound reasonably quickly."
Lucille Jones, deals intelligence analyst at Refinitiv said: "Concerns over the escalating situation in Ukraine and the political and economic fallout that will follow may affect corporate confidence and is likely to impact deal making further over the coming months."
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllA Look Back at High-Profile Hires in Big Law From Federal Government
4 minute read'Appropriate Relief'?: Google Offers Remedy Concessions in DOJ Antitrust Fight
4 minute read'So Many Firms' Have Yet to Announce Associate Bonuses, Underlining Big Law's Uneven Approach
5 minute readAs Profits Rise, Law Firms Likely to Make More AI Investments in 2025
Trending Stories
- 1Tuesday Newspaper
- 2Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-85
- 3Decision of the Day: Administrative Court Finds Prevailing Wage Law Applies to Workers Who Cleaned NYC Subways During Pandemic
- 4Trailblazing Broward Judge Retires; Legacy Includes Bush v. Gore
- 5Federal Judge Named in Lawsuit Over Underage Drinking Party at His California Home
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250