The Marble Palace Blog: Tweeting Supreme Court History
Duke Law professor Marin Levy has found a way to make Supreme Court history approachable and interesting, with small bites and Twitter threads.
March 10, 2022 at 05:15 PM
4 minute read
United States Supreme CourtThank you for reading The Marble Palace Blog, which I hope will inform and surprise you about the Supreme Court of the United States. My name is Tony Mauro. I've covered the Supreme Court since 1979 and for ALM since 2000. I semiretired in 2019, but I am still fascinated by the high court. I'll welcome any tips or suggestions for topics to write about. You can reach me at [email protected].
Twitter is many things, but it is hard to imagine it would be a resource for information about U.S. Supreme Court history.
But Marin Levy, a Duke University School of Law professor who is an expert on the federal judiciary and courts, decided during the pandemic to do just that, showing dozens of pictures of the likes of Oliver Wendell Holmes and Louis Brandeis, with fun facts about them. (The Supreme Court Historical Society also tweets.)
Levy's latest gem is a March 3 Twitter thread about Justice William Brennan Jr. and how he finally agreed to hire a female law clerk after years of favoring male clerks only. Levy drew readers in with this introduction: "My heart is wide open for this story tonight … It's about how Justice William Brennan, the liberal lion, was convinced to hire his first woman law clerk and who that clerk was. (Hint: She's a judge now herself.)" That clerk was Marsha Berzon, now a senior judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Levy got much praise from her followers, including one comment from Hogan Lovells partner Neal Katyal: "Amazing story. Thank you."
I interviewed Levy about how her Twitter threads and how her project came about:
When and why did you start these Supreme Court history threads?
Between all of us, the court threads began as a lark. I study courts for a living, and had been posting various "judicial fun facts" here and there. But then one night, at the beginning of the pandemic, the mood just felt so bleak and before I knew it, I was sharing what I hoped would be a light-hearted story—about the time I tried to buy Justice [Antonin] Scalia a drink.
That was the starting point and from there I began writing weekly, or so, threads about the bench and the people who occupy it. There are so many wonderful stories out there—so many inspiring people—and it's a true joy to get to share them each week.
Who is your target audience? And how many people have "liked" or followed your threads?
I try not to have any particular audience in mind—or I become very self-conscious very quickly! But it does seem that the threads are picked up by the "appellate Twitter" set—and they are a wonderful (and extremely witty) crowd.
Sometimes a few hundred people will like a particular thread and then sometimes, shockingly, it will be a few thousand. At the end of the day, I think many of us are drawn to learning about the trailblazers and, just as importantly, those who helped them along the way.
Have you gotten feedback from other SCOTUS nerds, historians, lawyers, etc. Any comments from justices? If I'm not mistaken, Justice [Samuel] Alito is a Duke fan and visitor.
The most gratifying feedback comes from people who say they learned something new and felt inspired by a particular story. There have been lovely comments by lawyers, other law professors, and even by a few members of the Article III club … but no justices yet!
Have you considered another format, such as turning the threads into a book?
A friend suggested the threads could be a book and I love the idea. My one hesitation is that each thread is meant to be bite-sized—something of an amuse-bouche. I'm not certain how that would translate into book form. Perhaps it works as a tasting menu? It would certainly be fun to attempt it.
Have you reached the point where you would feature current justices, or will you stay with the pre-Roberts era?
I might move closer to the present. One thing that is attractive about the past is that we tend to not be as acquainted with those figures—there is quite a bit to unearth and share. Those stories are also complete. When it comes to the present justices, it feels like they are still writing their stories.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllUnder Suspension in California, Eastman Continues Supreme Court Practice
8 minute readTrump Picks Personal Criminal Defense Lawyers for Solicitor General, Deputy Attorney General
Lingering Questions at Supreme Court About Climate Change Litigation Need Resolution
6 minute readJustices Ask If They Should Have Even Taken Nvidia’s Appeal of Investor Suit
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Read the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome,' DOJ Says, Proposing Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
- 2Voir Dire Voyeur: I Find Out What Kind of Juror I’d Be
- 3When It Comes to Local Law 97 Compliance, You’ve Gotta Have (Good) Faith
- 4Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Virginia Griffith, Director of Business Development at OutsideGC
- 5Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Bill Tanenbaum, Partner & Chair, AI & Data Law Practice Group at Moses Singer
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250