The Marble Palace Blog: How a 14-Year-Old Student Made Supreme Court History
After Brown v. Board of Education, Chief Justice Earl Warren insisted on hiring an African-American student to become one of the court's "pages" or aides.
May 27, 2022 at 11:52 AM
4 minute read
United States Supreme CourtA few months after the Supreme Court handed down the landmark Brown v. Board of Education decision in May 1954, the justices set forth a lesser-known milestone within the court building itself (also known as the Marble Palace).
The milestone had to do with the court's "pages," young students hired to help justices by retrieving books, delivering water and undertaking other chores during oral arguments and similar duties outside the courtroom. They were trusted by the justices.
After decades of all-white pages, the court issued a press release in July 1954 stating that Charles Vernon Bush, a 14-year-old D.C. Banneker Junior High School student, would be the first African-American page at the high court. In part because of the recent Brown v. Board decision, the news made some headlines.
The New York Times, for example, wrote, "Oddly, this will be, in a way, the first implementation of the Court's ruling that segregation is unconstitutional." Bush was also the first minority student to attend the Capitol Page School, which educated pages for the legislative branch as well as the Supreme Court. Because the page school was considered part of the D.C. public school system, Bush was regarded as the school system's first minority student.
In an article in the Journal of Supreme Court History, court scholar Todd Peppers recounts the life and importance of Charles Bush, and how then-Chief Justice Earl Warren, relatively new to the job, insisted that a black student be recruited as one of the four pages that year. Neither Warren's 1977 memoir nor Warren biographies appear to mention his effort to find a black page.
Warren always greeted the pages with a hearty "Good morning, boys" when he prepared to take the bench. (The first female Supreme Court page was Deborah Gelin, who served from 1972 to 1975.)
In a 2007 interview found by Peppers, Bush confirmed that Warren pushed to integrate the Supreme Court pages. "His intent was to demonstrate to the world that the Supreme Court was indeed serious about the school integration decision," Bush said. "And that was important to him because the implementation hearings were occurring in the next [court] session."
Court staff scrambled to find possible recruits. Marshal of the court T. Perry Lippett recommended Bush. Peppers said that "Charles was an exemplary student who consistently made his junior high school honor roll while juggling a host of extracurricular activities: captain of the debate team; member of the varsity basketball team and the spelling team; class treasurer; actor and director of school plays; recipient of awards in science competitions; member of the National Honor Society; member of the school newspaper's business staff. And he had a perfect three-year attendance record."
Bush was welcomed among most but not all court staffers. Bush said, "The messengers and the janitorial staff were tickled pink that I was there." Another fellow page said of Bush that, "While he was not always treated well by many of us, he maintained the higher ground" and "earned the respect of all and made many friends."
Bush's tenure as a page ended in 1957, and he went on to Howard University and Georgetown University, followed by a stint in the U.S. Air Force and then positions in business. He died in 2012.
One friend and colleague of Bush who is still alive is George Hutchinson, of counsel at the Finnegan law firm in Washington. Hutchinson was a page in 1938 and then became an assistant to the marshal, where part of his job was looking after the pages. Later, Hutchinson became the court's last "court crier" who had the task of gaveling the court to order and shouting "Oyez, Oyez, Oyez."
Now well into his 90s, Hutchinson told me this week that he remembered Charles Bush well. "I used to supervise him to some degree," Hutchinson said. "He treated people well and was treated well. He was very smart. A fine person." Hutchinson recalled that pages were required to wear knickers when they were at the court. The problem was that the young pages grew fast, and they had to acquire new knickers every year at their own expense. "They had to pay for their pants!" Hutchinson exclaimed.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllUnder Suspension in California, Eastman Continues Supreme Court Practice
8 minute readTrump Picks Personal Criminal Defense Lawyers for Solicitor General, Deputy Attorney General
Lingering Questions at Supreme Court About Climate Change Litigation Need Resolution
6 minute readJustices Ask If They Should Have Even Taken Nvidia’s Appeal of Investor Suit
Trending Stories
- 1Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-61
- 2Decision of the Day: School District's Probe Was a 'Sham'; Title IX Administrator Showed Sex-Based Bias
- 3US Magistrate Judge Embry Kidd Confirmed to 11th Circuit
- 4Shaq Signs $11 Million Settlement to Resolve Astrals Investor Claims
- 5McCormick Consolidates Two Tesla Chancery Cases
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250