Legendary 752-Pound 'Bahia Emerald': Mayer Brown Nears Repatriation Order for Brazil
The Bahia Emerald, a 752-pound stone smuggled to the U.S. more than a decade ago, is expected to soon return to Brazil.
June 13, 2022 at 12:19 PM
5 minute read
ConversationThe original version of this story was published on Law.com International
Mayer Brown is closing in on a rare forfeiture order from the U.S. Department of Justice on behalf of the government of Brazil, which wants a colossal green stone known as the Bahia Emerald repatriated.
Litigation & dispute resolution partner John Nadolenco got involved with the emerald in 2014, when a letter showed up at the Mayer Brown office in Los Angeles. The stone was being held by the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department at an undisclosed location amid lawsuits in California over its ownership.
The letter was from the government of Brazil, which was seeking proposals from law firms to help recover the emerald.
"I frankly thought it was a hoax," Nadolenco told Law.com International. "I checked with our lawyers in Brazil, and they said we think this is actually legit."
Nadolenco flew to Rio de Janeiro to consult with Gustavo Fernandes de Andrade, a partner in the litigation & arbitration practice of Tauil & Chequer Advogados, a large Brazilian law firm that has been associated with Mayer Brown since 2009. Then Nadolenco traveled to Brasilia, the capital of Brazil, to outline a strategy for the Brazilian government.
Mayer Brown got the job.
Fernando Filgueiras de Araujo, a federal attorney in Brazil's foreign disputes unit, said Mayer Brown was hired because of the firm's strong track record, the key team members it proposed putting on the case and its fee.
"Mayer Brown was and is key to the success of the case so far," Filgueiras told Law.com International.
So far, cautions Filgueiras, because the quest to reclaim what's believed to be the world's largest emerald has been full of twists and turns, as well as dubious characters.
The 752-pound gem has changed hands multiple times. Some experts place its value at hundreds of millions of dollars, while others see a brittle, worthless rock. Several claimants allege it was stolen from them.
The gem is actually a big, rough rock that contains nine separate crystals. One of these crystals is thought to be among the largest single emerald crystal ever unearthed. The whole mass weighs nearly as much as an adult bison.
|Intriguing Puzzle
For the Mayer Brown team, the case was an intriguing puzzle—both due to its legal complexity and the mythos surrounding precious stones.
"You have to be fascinated by the world's biggest emerald," said Kelly Kramer, the Washington D.C.-based co-head of Mayer Brown's white-collar defense and compliance practice and co-counsel with Nadolenco on the emerald case.
"The emerald is wrapped by myth and legend."
Since being pulled from a mine in northeastern Brazil in 2001, the Bahia Emerald has allegedly survived a panther attack, the floods of Hurricane Katrina in New Orleans, and was nearly sold to disgraced financier and fraudster Bernie Madoff. Some believe the rock is cursed.
The first skirmish in Brazil's efforts to claim the stone was to establish that the emerald was illegally mined. Here, Mayer Brown's international partners in Brazil came in handy, as they were able to answer technical questions related to Brazilian law.
For starters, Brazil's Constitution states that all mining assets in the country belong to Brazil. As such, mining in Brazil requires a permit that the miners of the Bahia Emerald lacked.
Brazil had to prove the merits of the case and show that it was determined to pursue it through to the end in order to convince the U.S. Department of Justice to dedicate resources toward recovering the stone. Mayer Brown secured a restraining order in 2015 to keep the stone safe in the U.S. while criminal charges proceeded in Brazil.
The Brazilian criminal trial and ensuing appeal process concluded in 2021.
In April 2022, the U.S. Department of Justice filed a motion with the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia under a mutual legal assistance treaty with Brazil asking the court to order the emerald's forfeiture. That motion was fully briefed in May, paving the way for the emerald to be returned to Brazil.
Under the treaty, Brazil was allowed to request the stone's return after the Brazilians, who assisted with its illegal export to the U.S., exhausted their appellate rights following their criminal convictions in Brazilian courts.
"The Bahia Emerald proceeding is a textbook case of how difficult it is to enforce decisions through international cooperation, especially in asset recovery cases," said Filgueiras, the Brazilian prosecutor.
The alternative to appealing directly to the U.S. Department of Justice would have been for Brazil to litigate its claim individually with each of the claimants in the U.S.
Brazil plans to display the massive stone in a museum. Neither Nadolenco nor Kramer have ever seen the Bahia Emerald in person.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom the Bench to the Booth: 2 Former Judges Now at Gibson Dunn Pair for Podcast
'Lawyers Are Lovely as Clients': Meet the Munger Tolles Trial Attorney Defending Law Firms
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Zero-Dollar Verdict: Which of Florida's Largest Firms Lost?
- 2Appellate Div. Follows Fed Reasoning on Recusal for Legislator-Turned-Judge
- 3SEC Obtained Record $8.2 Billion in Financial Remedies for Fiscal Year 2024, Commission Says
- 4Judiciary Law §487 in 2024
- 5Polsinelli's Revenue and Profits Surge Amid Partner De-Equitizations, Retirements
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250