The Marble Palace Blog: The Story of a Forgotten Black Supreme Court Advocate From the 19th Century
Cornelius Jones, one of the few Black Supreme Court advocates of his time, is remembered.
September 23, 2022 at 01:33 PM
3 minute read
Thank you for reading The Marble Palace Blog, which I hope will inform and surprise you about the Supreme Court of the United States. My name is Tony Mauro. I've covered the Supreme Court since 1979 and for ALM since 2000. I semiretired in 2019, but I am still fascinated by the high court. I'll welcome any tips or suggestions for topics to write about. You can reach me at [email protected].
From 1989 to 2006, James Feldman ably argued more than 40 U.S Supreme Court cases on behalf of the Solicitor General's Office. He launched a solo practice in 2006 but in recent years, he has almost set the practice aside. "I still have a practice but it's taking up less of my time," Feldman said in an interview.
He has been using his time instead for deep research into a Supreme Court advocate from the 1890s that almost no one knows about: Cornelius Jones, one of the few Black lawyers who argued before the high court in that period.
After years of research, Feldman finished a lengthy article for the latest Journal of Supreme Court History, titled "Cornelius Jones, Forgotten Black Supreme Advocate and Fighter for Civil Rights in the Plessy Era." The journal includes a photograph of Jones on the cover.
"He was an amazing figure, and unfortunately has been nearly forgotten," Feldman said. "I quickly realized that no one had ever actually written about his life and legal work as a whole. When the pandemic came, I sat down, did a bunch more research on what mainly what you can now do online, and I wrote it."
Feldman first learned about Jones in 1990 while researching Gibson v. Mississippi, an 1896 civil rights case that involved jury selection and the disfranchisement of Black voters.
As it happened, Jones was responsible for two Supreme Court cases—Gibson and Smith v. Mississippi—on the same day that Plessy v. Ferguson was argued. Another lawyer argued the Gibson case and Jones handled the Smith case. Both were Black, and Feldman said it may be only the second and third times a Black advocate argued before the high court. (Everett Waring was the first, according to Feldman.)
Justice John Marshall Harlan wrote the opinions of both cases, and in both, Jones lost. In his Gibson opinion, Harlan said he understood the civil rights asserted by the lawyers "so forcibly presented by his counsel, who are of his race." Feldman said it may be the only Supreme Court opinion in which the race of the attorneys who presented the case were mentioned.
Jones was involved in other Supreme Court cases and other litigation, and Feldman says he was "a highly skilled lawyer." Jones moved to Oklahoma and also got involved in politics, Feldman said, continuing his work even though Jones did not succeed in some of his cases. Jones died in 1931.
Said Feldman, "Jones lost all of his major struggles. The country, and the legal system, were not ready to enforce the rights for which he fought," Feldman said.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSenate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
Who Knocked on the Supreme Court’s Door in November?
Supreme Court Takes Up TikTok's Challenge to Upcoming Ban or Sale
Justices Wade Into South Carolina's Medicaid Fight With Planned Parenthood
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250