How Do Jurists Decide When Originalism, Precedent Diverge? Appellate Judges Give Their Thoughts
"This is one of these eternal debates that I have—I'm sure many judges have—with law clerks," said Judges James Ho of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
November 09, 2023 at 05:13 PM
4 minute read
JudgesFederal appellate judges Thursday discussed ways to approach cases in which U.S. Supreme Court precedent seems to conflict with originalist legal arguments, including by having profound talks with their law clerks about the constitutional duty of jurists.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
Trending Stories
- 1The Law Firm Disrupted: For Big Law Names, Shorter is Sweeter
- 2Wine, Dine and Grind (Through the Weekend): Summer Associates Thirst For Experience in 'Real Matters'
- 3The 'Biden Effect' on Senior Attorneys: Should I Stay or Should I Go?
- 4BD Settles Thousands of Bard Hernia Mesh Lawsuits
- 5First Lawsuit Filed Alleging Contraceptive Depo-Provera Caused Brain Tumor
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250