The current conflict between Israel and Hamas raises a host of legal questions about the application of the Law of Armed Conflict (LOAC). One of the major criticisms raised against Israel is that its actions in Gaza are “disproportional.” This position is based on the claims that there are already more than 15,000 Palestinian civilian casualties, many of them women and children.

In fact, the requirement of proportionality in attack appears in the international LOAC in two distinct contexts. One context requires countries to exercise their right of self-defense only to the extent that their response is proportional to the attack that they are seeking to repel (Proportional Use of Force). The other context is the prohibition of launching a specific attack that causes excessive civilian casualties (Principles of Proportionality in the Law of Armed Conflict – LOAC).

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]