Attorney Caryn Strickland testifies during a House Judiciary Subcommittee on Courts, Intellectual Property, and the Internet hearing titled “Workplace Protections for Federal Judiciary Employees: Flaws in the Current System and the Need for Statutory Change,” on March 17, 2022. Photo: Diego M. Radzinschi/ALM
Trial began Monday in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of North Carolina in former federal public defender Caryn Strickland’s closely watched sexual harassment case against the judiciary, with the government arguing that the discrimination alleged by Strickland was, in reality, an “ordinary work dispute.”
U.S. Department of Justice attorneys representing the judiciary zeroed in on one particular email that Strickland’s supervisor, who she accused of harassment, sent to her with the subject line “mas dinero” and in which he said he “deal[s] in pay-for-stay.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
