UnitedHealthcare Group monument signage at its corporate headquarters in Minnetonka, Minnesota. Credit: Google'Health Care Behemoth'?: DOJ Seeks Injunction Blocking $3.3B UnitedHealth Merger Proposal
“The Justice Department will not hesitate to check unlawful consolidation and monopolization in the health care market that threatens to harm vulnerable patients, their families, and health care workers,” U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland said.
November 14, 2024 at 11:27 AM
3 minute read
Antitrust
What You Need to Know
- The U.S. Department of Justice seeks a permanent injunction preventing UnitedHealth from consummating its proposed acquisition of Amedisys Inc.
- Other plaintiffs in the lawsuit include state attorneys general for Illinois, Maryland, New Jersey and New York.
- UnitedHealth defends its $3.3 billion proposed merger as procompetitive.
The U.S. Department of Justice and several states have filed a lawsuit seeking to block the insurance provider UnitedHealth Group Inc. from acquiring the nation’s largest home health and hospice firm.
UnitedHealth’s proposed $3.3 billion merger with Amedisys Inc. is “presumptively anticompetitive and illegal” under the Clayton Act, according to the allegations in the complaint.
The complaint, filed Tuesday in U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland, was surfaced by Law.com Radar.
“We are challenging this merger because home health and hospice patients and their families experiencing some of the most difficult moments of their lives deserve affordable, high quality care options,” U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland said Tuesday in a statement. “The Justice Department will not hesitate to check unlawful consolidation and monopolization in the health care market that threatens to harm vulnerable patients, their families, and health care workers.”
UnitedHealth’s Optum Health business in June 2023 proposed an all-cash offer to combine with Amedisys.
“The Amedisys combination with Optum would be pro-competitive and further innovation, leading to improved patient outcomes and greater access to quality care,” UnitedHealth said Tuesday in a statement. “We will vigorously defend against the DOJ’s overreaching interpretation of the antitrust laws.”
UnitedHealth is a “vertically integrated healthcare behemoth” that generated revenues of $372 billion in 2023, according to the complaint. “UnitedHealth’s proposed acquisition of Amedisys threatens to substantially lessen competition in local home health, hospice, and nurse labor markets throughout the country.”
The Justice Department, along with Illinois, Maryland, New Jersey and New York, seek a permanent injunction preventing UnitedHealth from consummating its proposed acquisition of Amedisys.
Attorneys for the United States also seek civil penalties against Amedisys on allegations that the hospice care provider violated the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 from December 2023 to August 2024.
Amedisys is accused of submitting “erroneous and inaccurate” data to federal regulators and certifying that it had complied with an information request from the DOJ’s antitrust division. The company could face a civil penalty of nearly $52,000 per day for each day of its alleged noncompliance with the HSR Act, according to the complaint.
This action was surfaced by Law.com Radar, which delivers artificial intelligence-enhanced case summaries and daily case reports from more than 2,200 state and federal courts. Click here to get started and be among the first to act on opportunities in your region, practice area or client sector.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
'Possible Harm'?: Winston & Strawn Will Appeal Unfavorable Ruling in NASCAR Antitrust Lawsuit
3 minute read
'Sharp and Profound' Policy Shifts Prompt DC Law Firms to Evaluate Opportunities, Challenges
5 minute read
High Court Asked to Review DOJ's 'Illusory Promise,' Religious Charter School, Meta Class Action
Trump Likely to Keep Up Antitrust Enforcement, but Dial Back the Antagonism
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Rudy Giuliani's Attorneys Seek Withdrawal in Debt Enforcement Case
- 2SEC, South Florida Developer Rishi Kapoor Reach Settlement
- 3Senate Democrats Advance 4th Circuit Pick Ryan Park’s Nomination
- 4Judge Rejects Meta’s Plea to Send FTC Antitrust Suit to Trash Heap
- 5How Have You Fared in 2024? Share Your Insights in the Managing Partners Survey
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
