Nevada Supreme Court in Carson City, NV. (Photo: Jason Doiy/ALM)Nevada Supreme Court to Decide Fate of Groundbreaking Contingency Cap Ballot Measure
The Nevada Supreme Court heard oral arguments this week about an Uber-backed ballot measure that would impose a 20% cap on contingency fees in all civil cases, the strictest in the nation.
December 06, 2024 at 08:06 PM
5 minute read
What You Need to Know
- Deepak Gupta represents two challengers, the Uber Sexual Assault Survivors for Legal Accountability and the Nevada Justice Association, who insist the ballot measure's description was misleading.
- During arguments, several panelists probed Uber attorney Bradley Schrager on whether the ballot measure’s description of its effect, as required by Nevada law, misled voters because it was ambiguous about its definition of the word 'recovery.'
- Uber, which contributed $5 million to the measure, backed previous initiatives in California and Massachusetts that focused on whether its drivers should be classified as independent contractors or employees.
A lawyer for an Uber-backed ballot initiative that would impose the strictest cap on contingency fees in the country faced questions this week from the Nevada Supreme Court.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
Related Stories
View AllYou Might Like
View All
Legal Issues to Watch in the US Appeals Courts in 2025
Second Circuit Upholds $5M Judgment Against Trump in E. Jean Carroll Case
4 minute read
Divided 5th Circuit Shoots Down Nasdaq Diversity Rules
Lawyers, Law Groups Oppose Proposal to Require Court Approval for Amicus Briefs
Trending Stories
- 1Winston & Strawn Snags Sidley Austin Cross-Border Transactions Partner in Miami
- 2U.S. Attorney Markenzy Lapointe Stepped Down
- 3Slideshow: Judges Who've Retired But Didn't Step Down
- 4Husch Blackwell Hires Former Adobe Counsel to Oversee AI Advisory Offering
- 5CFPB Finalizes Rule Removing Medical Debt From Credit Reports
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
