The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether a 13-year-old girl's constitutional rights were violated when school officials strip-searched her for a prescription-strength pain reliever. No pills were found on the student. The 9th Circuit last year ruled in favor of the student, calling the search "grossly intrusive." The Court also will consider, even if the search is found unconstitutional, whether the school vice principal who ordered the search is financially liable for damages.
January 20, 2009 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The Supreme Court agreed Friday to decide whether a 13-year-old girl’s constitutional rights were violated when school officials strip-searched her for a prescription-strength pain reliever.
The Court also will consider, even if the search is found unconstitutional, whether the school vice principal who ordered the search is financially liable for damages.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Celebrating achievement, excellence, and innovation in the legal profession in the UK.
Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers and financiers for the real estate healthcare event of the year!
This event shines a spotlight on how individuals and firms are changing the investment advisory industry where it matters most.
Role TitleAssociate General Counsel, Global EmploymentGrade F13Reporting ToSenior Legal Counsel, Global EmploymentProgram/Tool/ Department/U...
Ryan & Conlon, LLP, is a boutique firm specializing in insurance defense. We are a small eclectic practice with a busy and fast paced en...
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY PROSECUTION PARALEGAL - NEW JERSEY OR NEW YORK OFFICESProminent mid-Atlantic law firm with multiple regional office lo...
Breaking news and trends for law firm and legal departments about the evolving federal regulations in a volatile political climate.
