Determining the settlement value of a high-stakes lawsuit can be one of the most complicated and uncertain tasks both inside and outside attorneys must undertake. Litigators can never know everything, but part of the expertise for which clients are paying is the ability to meaningfully evaluate the risks associated with litigation. Some cases are easier than others. Many companies, like drug manufacturers that experience a large volume of similar claims, develop a sophisticated mathematical valuation matrix based on variables like claims, injuries and jurisdiction.
Many cases are not subject to such an analysis, however. For example, what does a lawyer do when a client’s major customer sues, claiming that the multimillion-dollar custom inventory management software system the company provided is a complete failure requiring rescission — or a patent troll crawls out of the piney woods of east Texas claiming a client’s No. 1 selling product infringes on its patent? Theories for valuing a “one off” lawsuit come in many different shapes and sizes, but ultimately both outside counsel and in-house legal departments agree with the Under Armor commercial that job one is to “protect this house” — put the client in the best position to attack and reduce the settlement value of any “one off” litigation.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
