Elena Kagan shattered at least one truism of the modern U.S. Supreme Court confirmation process: that a successful nominee must have prior experience as a federal appellate judge.
But the shift didn’t come easily. Kagan’s Aug. 5 confirmation as the Court’s 112th justice came after months of attacks on her legal career. Republicans called her a political lawyer and pointed to how little time she spent in courtrooms compared to past nominees from outside the “judicial monastery.” Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.), the top Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee, even said Kagan is not a “real lawyer.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
