Sign In
Events
Newsletters
Search

Close

Close Search

Cancel

SEARCH
MY LAW.COMNEW

Gaytan v. State of Texas

A jury convicted appellant of 20 counts of aggravated sexual assault and one count of indecency with a child. During the trial, the court allowed two adult female relatives of appellant?s to testify that he had molested them more than twenty 20 years earlier. Appellant objected to the admission of their testimony, and on appeal he argues that the admission of their testimony was error requiring reversal because: 1. He did not open the door to their testimony by advancing a defensive theory of fabrication; 2. the testimony's unfairly prejudicial effect far outweighed its probative value; and 3. the testimony was not admissible to prove motive, intent or knowledge. Appellant also argues that the trial court erred by refusing to strike his 6-year-old niece's testimony because she admitted that she could not directly recall being abused. Finally, he argues that the evidence was legally insufficient to sustain a conviction on 16 of his 20 assault counts. The trial court's judgment is affirmed. Austin Court of Appeals, No. 03-09-00370-CR, 01-21-2011

X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
OPINION

A jury convicted forty-five-year-old Frank Gaytan of twenty counts of aggravated sexual assault and one count of indecency with a child. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. §§ 21.11, 22.021 (West Supp. 2010). The jury assessed punishment at ninety-nine years’ confinement on each sexual-assault count and fifteen years’ confinement on the indecency count, all sentences to run consecutively. See id. § 3.03(b)(2)(A) (West Supp. 2010) (sentences may run consecutively when defendant is convicted of multiple offenses arising out of same criminal episode under penal code sections 21.11 and 22.021). The jury found that between August 18 and September 8, 2004, Gaytan repeatedly molested his six-year-old niece, C.R., while baby-sitting her. During the trial, the court allowed two adult female relatives of Gaytan’s to testify that he had molested them more than twenty years earlier. Gaytan objected to the admission of their testimony, and on appeal he argues that the admission of their testimony was error requiring reversal. Gaytan argues that (1) he did not open the door to their testimony by advancing a defensive theory of fabrication; (2) the testimony’s unfairly prejudicial effect far outweighed its probative value, see Tex. R. Evid. 403; and (3) the testimony was not admissible to prove motive, intent, or knowledge under Texas Rule of Evidence 404(b). Gaytan also argues that the trial court erred by refusing to strike C.R.’s testimony because C.R. admitted that she could not directly recall being abused. See Tex. R. Evid. 602 (testimony must be based on personal knowledge). Finally, he argues that the evidence was legally insufficient to sustain a conviction on sixteen of his twenty assault counts. We affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Trending Stories

 
Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.

LEARN MORE

More From ALM

Premium Subscription
With this subscription you will receive unlimited access to high quality, online, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry. This is perfect for attorneys licensed in multiple jurisdictions or for attorneys that have fulfilled their CLE requirement but need to access resourceful information for their practice areas.
View Now
Team Accounts
Our Team Account subscription service is for legal teams of four or more attorneys. Each attorney is granted unlimited access to high quality, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry along with administrative access to easily manage CLE for the entire team.
View Now
Bundle Subscriptions
Gain access to some of the most knowledgeable and experienced attorneys with our 2 bundle options! Our Compliance bundles are curated by CLE Counselors and include current legal topics and challenges within the industry. Our second option allows you to build your bundle and strategically select the content that pertains to your needs. Both options are priced the same.
View Now
Go to CLE Center
British Legal Awards 2024
November 27, 2024
London

Celebrating achievement, excellence, and innovation in the legal profession in the UK.


Learn More
GlobeSt. Healthcare Real Estate 2024
December 02, 2024 - December 03, 2024
Scottsdale, AZ

Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers and financiers for the real estate healthcare event of the year!


Learn More
ThinkAdvisor LUMINARIES Awards 2024
December 11, 2024
Las Vegas, NV

This event shines a spotlight on how individuals and firms are changing the investment advisory industry where it matters most.


Learn More
Go to Events Go to Webcasts
Two Litigation Associate - Melville, NY and New York, NY (2 to 7 Years experience)

Prominent law firm seeks 2 associates to join our defense teams in our downtown New York City and Melville, NY offices.The Litigation Associ...


Apply Now ›
Seattle, WA Litigation Counsel

Description: Fox Rothschild has an opening for a Litigation Counsel in our Seattle office. Experience with insurance bad faith and coverage ...


Apply Now ›
Civil Litigation Attorney - New York

Robert C. Gottlieb & Associates PLLC is a 40-year-old litigation boutique looking to hire a civil attorney who has concentrated in civil...


Apply Now ›
Go to Lawjobs

Breaking news and trends for law firm and legal departments about the evolving federal regulations in a volatile political climate.

Federal Legal News
Special Coverage
Surveys & Rankings
National Law Journal