X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Before Lipez, Leval, *fn1 and Thompson, Circuit Judges. Leslie W. O’Brien for appellant Reyes-Guerrero. Rafael F. Castro Lang for appellant Meises.

Appellants Juan Mieses*fn2 and Jose Reyes-Guerrero were arrested in a reverse sting operation after they drove to a sham drug deal, with a third co-defendant, in a vehicle containing $100,000 in cash.*fn3 A jury found both appellants guilty of a single drug conspiracy count. On appeal, the pair claim that their convictions must be vacated because of three significant errors at trial: (1) the government’s use of improper overview testimony from the lead law enforcement agent in the case, (2) the indirect admission of the third co-defendant’s out-of-court statement implicating appellants, and (3) the district court’s refusal to allow the jury to hear an audiotape recorded on the day of their arrests.*fn4 Reyes-Guerrero further asserts that he is entitled to a judgment of acquittal because the evidence was insufficient to support the jury’s verdict.

As we shall explain, the overview testimony at issue here was improper and, to its credit, the district court acknowledged the error when it considered appellants’ post-trial motions for acquittal. See United States v. Reyes-Guerrero, 638 F. Supp. 2d 177, 185-90 (D.P.R. 2009). We also conclude that the district court erred in allowing testimony revealing the co-defendant’s inculpatory statement. Those two significant errors entitle appellants to a new trial, and we therefore vacate their convictions and remand for such new proceedings.*fn5

 
Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.

More From ALM

With this subscription you will receive unlimited access to high quality, online, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry. This is perfect for attorneys licensed in multiple jurisdictions or for attorneys that have fulfilled their CLE requirement but need to access resourceful information for their practice areas.
View Now
Our Team Account subscription service is for legal teams of four or more attorneys. Each attorney is granted unlimited access to high quality, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry along with administrative access to easily manage CLE for the entire team.
View Now
Gain access to some of the most knowledgeable and experienced attorneys with our 2 bundle options! Our Compliance bundles are curated by CLE Counselors and include current legal topics and challenges within the industry. Our second option allows you to build your bundle and strategically select the content that pertains to your needs. Both options are priced the same.
View Now
July 10, 2025
New York, NY

The National Law Journal Elite Trial Lawyers recognizes U.S.-based law firms performing exemplary work on behalf of plaintiffs.


Learn More
November 05, 2025
Washington, D.C.

The National Law Journal honors attorneys & judges who've made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in the D.C. area.


Learn More
February 24, 2025 - February 26, 2025
Las Vegas, NV

This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.


Learn More

THE CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE, FL INVITES YOUR INTEREST FOR THE POSITION OF CITY ATTORNEYWelcome to the City of Fort Lauderdale. Click on the ...


Apply Now ›

McCarter & English, LLP seeks an associate for an in-person position in McCarter s Washington DC office. McCarter s energy transactiona...


Apply Now ›

TIRED OF LAW? MOTIVATED REAL ESTATE AGENTS FOR F/T POSITION WITH TOP RESIDENTIAL REAL ESTATE TEAM AT BROWN HARRIS STEVENS RESIDENTIAL SALE...


Apply Now ›

Breaking news and trends for law firm and legal departments about the evolving federal regulations in a volatile political climate.

Surveys & Rankings
National Law Journal