Austin State Hospital v. Graham

Joel Graham sued Austin State Hospital, a governmental unit, and two of its employees, Dr. Vikar Nuzhath and Dr. Erik Lindfors ("the Doctors"), on health care liability claims. The hospital and the doctors moved to dismiss the claims under the Texas Tort Claims Act. Graham nonsuited the hospital, asserting that its motion to dismiss was thereby mooted. The doctors and the hospital objected. The trial court overruled the doctors' objection and didn't rule on the hospital's objection. On appeal, the appeals court held that a government employee's motion to dismiss based on §101.106(e) is neither a motion for summary judgment, as required by §51.014(a)(5), nor a plea to the jurisdiction, as required by §51.014(a)(8). An appeal may be taken from orders denying an assertion of immunity, as provided in §a)(5), regardless of the procedural vehicle used. The court of appeals' judgment is reversed and remanded. Texas Supreme Court, No. 10-0674, 08-26-2011.

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

The issue presented is whether an employee of a governmental unit may take an interlocutory appeal from an order denying his motion to dismiss based on section 101.106(e) of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code. We hold that he can and reverse the judgment of the court of appeals. 319 S.W.3d 905 (Tex. App.–Dallas 2010).

Joel Graham sued Austin State Hospital, a governmental unit, and two of its employees, Dr. Vikar Nuzhath and Dr. Erik Lindfors (“the Doctors”), on health care liability claims. The Hospital moved to dismiss the claims against the Doctors under section 101.106(e) of the Texas Tort Claims Act, which states: “If a suit is filed under [the Act] against both a governmental unit and any of its employees, the employees shall immediately be dismissed on the filing of a motion by the governmental unit.” TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE § 101.106(e). The Doctors also moved to dismiss under section 101.106(a) and (e). Graham then nonsuited the Hospital, asserting that its motion to dismiss was thereby mooted. The Hospital and the Doctors objected, arguing that the non-suit could not be used to defeat its statutory right to the immediate dismissal of its employees, and, in support of their objections and motions, later filed an affidavit in which a Hospital assistant superintendent asserted that the Doctors were Hospital employees. The trial court denied the Doctors’ motions and did not rule on the Hospital’s.

More From ALM

Discover how AI is transforming small law firms with increased efficiency, accuracy, and productivity. This latest report reveals key insights from a 2024 survey, showcasing how professionals are leveraging AI to improve billable hours and client services. Download now to explore the benefits and elevate your legal practice.

The Positive Impact of AI at Small Law Firms: 4 Key Insights

Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now

Premium Subscription

With this subscription you will receive unlimited access to high quality, online, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry. This is perfect for attorneys licensed in multiple jurisdictions or for attorneys that have fulfilled their CLE requirement but need to access resourceful information for their practice areas.
View Now

Team Accounts

Our Team Account subscription service is for legal teams of four or more attorneys. Each attorney is granted unlimited access to high quality, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry along with administrative access to easily manage CLE for the entire team.
View Now

Bundle Subscriptions

Gain access to some of the most knowledgeable and experienced attorneys with our 2 bundle options! Our Compliance bundles are curated by CLE Counselors and include current legal topics and challenges within the industry. Our second option allows you to build your bundle and strategically select the content that pertains to your needs. Both options are priced the same.
View Now

From Data to Decisions

Dynamically explore and compare data on law firms, companies, individual lawyers, and industry trends.

Exclusive Depth and Reach.

Law.com Compass includes access to our exclusive industry reports, combining the unmatched expertise of our analyst team with ALM’s deep bench of proprietary information to provide insights that can’t be found anywhere else.

Big Pictures and Fine Details

Law.com Compass delivers you the full scope of information, from the rankings of the Am Law 200 and NLJ 500 to intricate details and comparisons of firms’ financials, staffing, clients, news and events.

The National Law Journal Legal Awards 2024

October 24, 2024
Georgetown, Washington D.C.

The National Law Journal honors attorneys & judges who've made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in the D.C. area.

Learn More

GlobeSt. Women of Influence (WOI) 2024

July 22, 2024 - July 24, 2024
Lake Tahoe, CA

GlobeSt. Women of Influence Conference celebrates the women who drive the commercial real estate industry forward.

Learn More

New York Legal Awards 2024

September 05, 2024
New York, NY

The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.

Learn More