NEW YORK — A former Stroock & Stroock & Lavan partner who claimed he was wrongly denied pension benefits because he took his practice to another firm must settle his dispute in arbitration, a New York state court judge has ruled.
Michael Perlis sued in Los Angeles state court on Aug. 5, just two weeks after he jumped to Locke Lord with five other attorneys. Perlis argued that he was entitled to retirement benefits the firm had denied him.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
