X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
DISSENTING OPINON

The trial court properly granted summary judgment pursuant to the Fraudulent Transfer Act’s statute of repose. This Court’s reversal of summary judgment is an equitable outcome under the facts of this single case, but as the rule of law, it undermines the Fraudulent Transfer Act’s principle purpose of creating “uniformity” across the states and is contrary to the “absolute” nature of a statute of repose. To reach its holding, the Court had to read the phrase “the applicable statute of limitations” in section 16.064 of the Civil Practices and Remedies Code to mean “an applicable statute of limitations or repose”-language the Legislature could have adopted but did not. I therefore respectfully dissent.

Whittington’s Claim Was “Extinguished” by the Fraudulent Transfer Act’s Statute of Repose Section 24.010(a)(1) of the Fraudulent Transfer Act provides that certain Fraudulent Transfer Act claims are “extinguished” unless brought “within four years after the transfer was made or the obligation was incurred or, if later, within one year after the transfer or obligation was or could reasonably have been discovered by the claimant[.]” TEX. BUS. & COM. CODE ANN. § 24.010(a)(1) (West 2009). The parties agree that the statute of repose in section 24.010(a)(1) applies to Whittington’s claims against Nathan and that it bars Whittington’s claims unless the “ savings clause” in section 16.064(a) of the Civil Practice and Remedies Code (CPRC) tolls the running of the statute of repose. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 16.064 (West 2008).

 
Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.

More From ALM

With this subscription you will receive unlimited access to high quality, online, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry. This is perfect for attorneys licensed in multiple jurisdictions or for attorneys that have fulfilled their CLE requirement but need to access resourceful information for their practice areas.
View Now
Our Team Account subscription service is for legal teams of four or more attorneys. Each attorney is granted unlimited access to high quality, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry along with administrative access to easily manage CLE for the entire team.
View Now
Gain access to some of the most knowledgeable and experienced attorneys with our 2 bundle options! Our Compliance bundles are curated by CLE Counselors and include current legal topics and challenges within the industry. Our second option allows you to build your bundle and strategically select the content that pertains to your needs. Both options are priced the same.
View Now
July 10, 2025
New York, NY

The National Law Journal Elite Trial Lawyers recognizes U.S.-based law firms performing exemplary work on behalf of plaintiffs.


Learn More
November 05, 2025
Washington, D.C.

The National Law Journal honors attorneys & judges who've made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in the D.C. area.


Learn More
February 24, 2025 - February 26, 2025
Las Vegas, NV

This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.


Learn More

Search for the President and Dean California Western School of Law San Diego, California California Western School of Law (California ...


Apply Now ›

Duane Morris LLP has an opening for an associate with 2-3 years of experience with strong capital markets and corporate transactional backgr...


Apply Now ›

Our client, an established provider of professional liability insurance, has engaged us to identify a highly-qualified Senior Bad Faith Tria...


Apply Now ›

Breaking news and trends for law firm and legal departments about the evolving federal regulations in a volatile political climate.

Surveys & Rankings
National Law Journal