As legal technology advances and data volumes expand, it’s difficult for lawyers and in-house counsel to manage electronic discovery efficiently and effectively. Even with predictive coding and other technology-assisted review (TAR) choices on the rise, only the earliest adopters are ready to abandon the ever-present and misunderstood keyword search in favor of more technologically advanced search methodologies.
As experienced attorneys know, it’s not that simple to change from one methodology to another. While TAR can heighten defensibility and lower costs compared with linear review, many litigators view it only as a budding trend.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
