The Patent Act has been interpreted to provide liability for direct patent infringement only when a single person or entity performs all the elements of a patent claim, either by itself or vicariously, through an agent. Does that mean it is possible for someone to avoid infringement liability by performing some of the steps of a method patent himself and inducing someone else to perform the rest or by inducing a group of persons to perform the steps, so that no one person does them all?
By a narrow 6-5 vote, the en banc U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Akamai Technologies Inc. v. Limelight Networks Inc., 2012 WL 3764695 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 31, 2012), answered those questions with a clear “no.” In doing so, the en banc majority struggled to reconcile basic principles of patent infringement, reinterpreted the Patent Act and overruled prior precedent, all in an effort to make it easier for owners of method patents to bring claims of induced infringement.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
