WASHINGTON – The U.S. Supreme Court on Jan. 9 struggled with what lawyers can and cannot do when seeking information under the federal Driver’s Privacy Protection Act.
The justices heard arguments in Maracich v. Spears, 12-25, one of two privacy-related cases on the morning’s argument docket. In the second case, Missouri v. McNeely, 11-1425, the justices appeared reluctant to create a categorical rule that police officers do not need a warrant for a blood test in a drunken-driving investigation.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
