The revelation that the U.S. Department of Justice recently subpoenaed a large number of Associated Press telephone records has led to renewed calls for a federal reporter’s shield law.
A shield law generally prohibits compelling reporters to identify their confidential sources and protects reporters’ notes, telephone records and other work product from disclosure. Congress came close to passing such a law a few years ago in the wake of the Valerie Plame/CIA leak investigation, during which New York Times reporter Judith Miller was jailed for contempt after refusing to identify a source. The effort lost steam after the WikiLeaks scandal in 2010, but now, with White House backing, the bill has been reintroduced. But whatever the merits of a shield law, enacting one in response to the AP subpoena would be a feel-good gesture that makes little sense.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
