The debate over access to the U.S. Supreme Court has expanded beyond the decades-old question of whether video coverage of its proceedings should be allowed.
In part because of the demands of the digital age for greater transparency in all institutions, the discussion has grown to include audio and online streaming of arguments and opinion announcements, codes of conduct for justices, and disclosure of recusal and health information, among other things. Measures now before Congress would require camera access to the court and set explicit ethics standards for justices.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
