A California federal judge on May 14 refused to toss a putative consumer class action accusing nutritional supplement company Natrol Products Inc. of misleadingly marketing its diet tea as a weight loss aid, ruling the plaintiff alleged sufficient facts to support her claims.
The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California denied Natrol’s motion to dismiss, ruling that plaintiff Jessica Augustine had alleged sufficient facts to support her claims about Laci Le Beau Super Dieter’s Tea. Read order in Augustine v. Natrol Products Inc. here.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
