UnitedHealthcare systematically violates federal law by discriminating against patients with mental illness by denying treatment that is supported by prevailing medical standards and is deemed medically necessary, according to a proposed federal class action brought against the health insurer.
By refusing to cover residential treatment for patients and California residents Natasha Wit and Brian Muir, UnitedHealthcare violated a 2008 federal law that requires “parity” between coverage of treatment for medical and mental health conditions, including substance abuse, according to the complaint in Wit v. UnitedHealthcare Insurance Co., filed on May 21 in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]