Johnson & Johnson falsely labels a line of mouthwashes as able to restore tooth enamel, a claim disputed by an “overwhelming consensus” of dental experts, a class action filed in New York federal district court alleges.
In Bowling v. Johnson & Johnson, plaintiff Suzanna Bowling alleges the company slaps a premium price on its line of Total Care mouthwashes because of the enamel-enhancing claim, charging 36 percent more for Total Care products than its other mouthwashes. Read the complaint here.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
