A yarn manufacturer is not entitled to compel discovery from a nonprofit that confidentially tests cashmere samples for retailers and suppliers of cashmere, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit ruled on June 19.
Cascade Yarns Inc. sued Knitting Fever Inc. in Washington federal court, arguing its competitor falsely represented the cashmere content of its yarns. As part of the dispute, Cascade sought discovery from Cashmere and Camel Hair Manufactures Institute (CCHMI) about its testing program and of possible correspondence with Knitting Fever.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
