A gasket-maker that has been fighting to unseal evidence of alleged misrepresentation by plaintiffs in its bankruptcy wants to keep some information in the case sealed.
Ahead of an Oct. 16 on what information should be sealed in the case, Garlock Sealing Technologies LLC and two other related defendants said they were compelled to provide information subject to the protection of the attorney-client privilege or the attorney work-product privilege. The information came up in a dispute over whether Garlock’s past settlements were a fair measure of its liability.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
