U.S. District Judge Martin Feldman on Sept. 3 broke rank with the majority of federal jurists by upholding Louisiana’s ban on same-sex marriage. These laws were justified, he explained, because Louisiana has a legitimate interest “whether obsolete in the opinion of some, or not, in the opinion of others” in connecting children to “an intact family formed by their two biological parents.”

Even as Feldman recognized that the institution of marriage provides emotional, social and economic benefits to children, he deemed it permissible for states to grant these important benefits to some children — the children of opposite-sex couples — while denying them to ­others — the children of same-sex ­couples.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]