A federal magistrate judge presiding over pretrial matters in the transvaginal mesh multidistrict litigations has sided with the plaintiffs in the latest discovery dispute with Boston Scientific Corporation.

The company, facing over 12,000 lawsuits in which women allege that Boston Scientific’s pelvic mesh products caused them injury, argues the depositions would be irrelevant, burdensome and duplicative of discovery already produced.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]