Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg of the U.S. Supreme Court made news twice with her six-page dissent to a court order allowing Texas to implement a restrictive voter identification law that a lower federal court found racially discriminatory.
The first time the justice made news by releasing her fiery dissent at 5 a.m. on a Saturday morning after having worked on it throughout the night. The second time was when she corrected a minor error in her opinion (which I had flagged on the Election Law Blog) and announced through the Supreme Court’s press office that she had made such a change.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
