Target Corp. has suggested changes to make a proposed class-action settlement more palatable to a Minnesota federal judge, who had blocked a deal in the robotext litigation for, among other things, permitting much of the award to revert to the company.
In a Dec. 10 memorandum to the court, Target’s attorneys offered to remove a reversion clause from the $183, 375 settlement deal with lead plaintiff and pharmacist Jonathan Small, who alleged the retail chain violated the federal Telephone Consumer Protection Act, as amended by the Junk Fax Protection Act, by sending faxes to nearly 500 pharmacists without their permission and without an opt-out notice.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
