A federal judge in California has dismissed Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act claims leveled against Citibank NA and its mortgage servicing arm, accused of racking up unnecessary charges on defaulting borrowers.
The case, Stitt et al v. Citibank, N.A. et al, was originally combined with a similar action against Wells Fargo, which claimed both banks surreptitiously charged borrowers for unnecessary default-related costs.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
