A Washington federal judge has dismissed Encyclopaedia Britannica Inc.’s malpractice case against Dickstein Shapiro over the firm’s patent prosecution work for the company, finding that intellectual property at issue was ineligible for patenting.

U.S. District Judge Royce Lamberth, in a decision issued on Thursday, found that the encyclopedia company lost its “case-within-a-case“ under Section 101 of the Patent Act necessary to prevail on the malpractice claims.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]