When the North Carolina NAACP and the Advancement Project challenged a North Carolina law imposing some of the most restrictive voting requirements in the nation, they knew they would need heavy-hitting litigation support from trial through potentially the U.S. Supreme Court. Kirkland & Ellis and the firm’s Daniel Donovan stepped up to the plate.
Donovan and his clients have been on a legal roller coaster since filing the initial complaint in 2013 in federal district court in North Carolina.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
