Here’s a snippet of some of the commentary about Sotomayor’s statements: “First, would it include the Justices on the Supreme Court? If not, instant fail.” And this: “Until this justice works as a solo practitioner for a year, which she never has, and see what it‘s really like to try to earn a living as an attorney to support one‘s family, I suggest she keep her mouth shut and focus on her own job.”
What do you think? Is mandatory pro bono a good idea or bad? How would it be implemented? Should it apply to in-house, government and private lawyers the same?
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
