Woods argued that Andrés was trying to insert a morality clause into the contract that didn’t exist. She said Trump’s “political statements” weren’t related to the restaurant and that a win for Andrés would open the door to breach of contract suits against Trump over any number of positions he took as a candidate.
Update: This story was updated with comment from a lawyer representing Trump.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
