The U.S. Supreme Court, oblivious to external events like blizzards or presidential elections, heard oral arguments Tuesday in a case that illustrates how the election’s outcome could affect the court’s future business law decisions.
At issue in the consolidated cases Bank of America v. Miami and Wells Fargo v. Miami is a threshold question of standing, which does not often make headlines but is a crucial factor in gaining access to the courts for plaintiffs seeking redress from corporations. Recent court decisions on standing have been a target for critics who say the Roberts court leans too far toward business interests.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
