The U.S. Supreme Court issued two patent decisions from its 2015 term. Both were argued by Sullivan & Cromwell lawyers.
In Stryker v. Zimmer, Jeffrey Wall, co-head of the firm’s appellate litigation practice, persuaded a high court that’s usually squeamish about patent rights to give district judges more discretion over enhanced damages for willful infringement. The decision put $140 million back in play for Sullivan client Stryker Corp.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
