It was a small glimmer of hope. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit rejected Halo Electronics Inc.’s bid for enhanced damages in its patent infringement battle with Pulse Electronics Inc. last year. But two of the court’s 12 judges said Halo deserved a rehearing.

Halo and its Fish & Richardson attorneys took those arguments to the U.S. Supreme Court, knowing they carried some baggage.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]