I appreciate the prompt letter and their admission that they are in state courthouses making federal arrests. However, making arrests at courthouses, in my view, undermines public safety because victims and witnesses will fear coming to courthouses to help enforce the law. I am disappointed that despite local and state public safety issues at stake, courthouses are not on ICE’s ‘sensitive areas’ list that includes schools, churches, and hospitals.
Sessions and Kelly were responding to a March 16 letter from Cantil-Sakauye, asking that ICE agents stop using courthouse as “bait” to arrest undocumented immigrants. She called the arrests “neither safe nor fair.”
“They not only compromise our core value of fairness,” Cantil-Sakauye wrote, “but they undermine the judiciary’s ability to provide equal access to justice.”
The chief justice, asked about her use of the word “stalking” after she sent the letter, told San Francisco’s KQED that she chose the word intentionally. She likened immigrants’ fears to those of victims in the domestic violence court she once ran as a Sacramento County Superior Court judge.
“I used that word because it is what’s happening, and it may not be what [ICE agents’] exact intention is, but that’s how victims feel, that’s how the public begins to feel about that kind of behavior,” Cantil-Sakauye said.
The chief justice’s letter drew praise from California’s Democratic leaders, including lawmakers who gave her a standing ovation at her annual State of the Judiciary address to the Legislature on Monday. Sessions and Kelly gave no indication of granting Cantil-Sakauye’s request to stop the arrests.
“To be clear, the arrest of individuals by ICE officers and agents is predicated on investigation and targeting of specific persons who have been identified by ICE and other law enforcement agencies as subject to arrest for violations of federal law,” the Trump administration officials wrote. “ICE does not engage in ‘sweeps’ or other indiscriminate arrest practices.”
Sessions and Kelly suggested Cantil- Sakauye “express [her] concerns” about courthouse arrests to the governor and local officials “who have enacted policies that occasionally necessitate ICE officers and agents to make arrests in courthouses and other public places.”
California this week filed papers supporting the city of San Francisco in its suit challenging the Justice Department’s plan to withhold federal grants from so-called sanctuary cities. Santa Clara County and the cities of Salinas and Los Angeles have also sued.
The state’s amicus brief assailed the Trump administration’s executive order as “an aggressive attempt by President [Donald] Trump to coerce state and local jurisdictions into participating in immigration enforcement even in situations where that participation would undermine public safety and go against the best judgment of the law enforcement officials who are most familiar with local communities.”
Update: This report was updated with comment from the chief justice.
Copyright the The Recorder. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]