The U.S. Supreme Court won't weigh in on a copyright lawsuit in which printer manufacturer Lexmark is trying to stop Static Control Components, a computer-chip maker, whose parts allowed cheaper toner cartridges to be used in name-brand machines. Lexmark's appeal to the Court was filed late and rejected, so the case will return to a federal district court in Kentucky. Static Control contends that Lexmark engaged in anticompetitive and monopolistic conduct and should pay damages of more than $100 million.
June 08, 2005 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
The U.S. Supreme Court won’t weigh in on a closely watched copyright lawsuit in which a printer manufacturer is trying to stop a computer-chip maker whose parts allowed cheaper toner cartridges to be used in name-brand machines.
Lexmark International Inc. said Monday it looks forward to continuing the fight over what it says are its intellectual property rights. The printer maker wants to block Static Control Components Inc. of Sanford, N.C., from selling the computer chips.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Celebrating achievement, excellence, and innovation in the legal profession in the UK.
Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers and financiers for the real estate healthcare event of the year!
This event shines a spotlight on how individuals and firms are changing the investment advisory industry where it matters most.
Role TitleAssociate General Counsel, Global EmploymentGrade F13Reporting ToSenior Legal Counsel, Global EmploymentProgram/Tool/ Department/U...
Ryan & Conlon, LLP, is a boutique firm specializing in insurance defense. We are a small eclectic practice with a busy and fast paced en...
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY PROSECUTION PARALEGAL - NEW JERSEY OR NEW YORK OFFICESProminent mid-Atlantic law firm with multiple regional office lo...
