Lawmakers are trying to blunt the Supreme Court's Kelo v. City of New London decision, which says local governments can seize people's homes to make way for shopping malls and other private development. Legislation in the works would ban the use of federal funds for any project getting the go-ahead using the ruling. House Majority Leader Tom DeLay said Thursday the high court had made "a horrible decision" and he hoped it would cause a backlash.
July 01, 2005 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Lawmakers are trying to blunt a Supreme Court decision that says local governments can seize people’s homes to make way for shopping malls and other private development.
House Majority Leader Tom DeLay said Thursday the high court had made “a horrible decision” and he hoped it would cause a backlash.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers and financiers for the real estate healthcare event of the year!
This event shines a spotlight on how individuals and firms are changing the investment advisory industry where it matters most.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Our client, a boutique litigation firm established by former BigLaw partners, is seeking to hire a junior-mid level associate their rapidly ...
Shipman & Goodwin LLP is seeking an associate to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates must have four to eight years...
SENIOR ASSOCIATE ATTORNEY, BOUTIQUE LAW FIRM, CORPORATE LAW We provide strategic advisory and legal services to the world's leading archite...
