0 results for '*'
Texas firm disqualified from mining technology dispute
A state trial judge has disqualified Dallas-based Bickel & Brewer from representing a plaintiff in a high-stakes lawsuit over mining technology.Latham tops Calif.'s prestigious firms in associate survey
California associates have voted, and they agree that Latham & Watkins is the most prestigious firm to work for in the state, according to the newest Vault rankings. Ora Fisher, Latham's Silicon Valley office managing partner, chalks up the positive results from associates to several causes, including "the quality of work we get." But while Latham associates weren't surprised the firm got top billing in the Golden State, they were surprised by the all-around glowing review of being an associate at Latham.Prop 65 deals shot down in Calif.
A California appellate court Friday tossed out six court-approved Proposition 65 settlements involving major hotel chains, ruling that the trial court did not evaluate whether the settlements "served the public interest."Minneapolis firm tallies 25th good deal for dropped GM, Chrysler dealers
Dady & Gardner has scored 20 wins and five settlements on behalf of car dealerships that were dropped from the General Motors and Chrysler networks when the two companies filed for bankruptcy last year.View more book results for the query "*"
Quest settles lawsuit accusing it of 'cramming'
a large telecommunications company settled a consumer fraud suit with the state of Arizona for $3.75 million on July 11. Customers of Qwest Communications International Inc., Qwest Corp. and Qwest Wireless LLC alleged that they were victims of cramming, the practice of charging customers for services that they did not request or authorize. The consumers further alleged that Qwest would not refund them the money they paid for the unwanted services. The state, on behalf of about 1,500 Arizona consumers, suedCRIMINAL PRACTICE | Patdown of suspect was justified
Patting down a suspect before transporting him in a patrol car to the scene of a crime for possible identification by the victim does not violate the Fourth Amendment, the 2d U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled.Philip Morris sues Internet vendors
Philip Morris USA said it sued two Internet operators in federal court for allegedly selling illegally imported cigarettes with the company's trademarks, including the Marlboro brand. In its filing with the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, the company said the owners or operators of several Web sites sold cigarettes that violated the Imported Cigarette Compliance Act of 2000.Trending Stories
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
Leveraging Technology to Improve Employee Engagement and Client Satisfaction
Brought to you by CARET Legal
Download Now
Yearly Roundup: Strategic Insights for Law Firm Decision Making
Brought to you by CARET Legal
Download Now
Small Law Firm Playbook: The Expert's Guide to Getting the Most Out of Legal Software
Brought to you by PracticePanther
Download Now