Comey Reaches Deal for Testimony Following House Subpoena Fight
The arrangement came two days after a federal judge heard arguments on Comey's bid to quash the subpoena.
December 02, 2018 at 01:17 PM
4 minute read
Former FBI Director James Comey on Sunday dropped his challenge to a congressional subpoena issued by Republicans, telling a Washington, D.C., federal judge he's reached an “acceptable accommodation” to voluntarily testify.
Comey is expected to sit for a voluntary interview with the House Judiciary Committee on Dec. 7, according to the agreement. Comey will receive a transcript of the interview when it is available and will be permitted to make some or all of the transcript public.
The move came two days after the judge heard arguments on Comey's bid to block a subpoena issued by House Judiciary Chairman Bob Goodlatte, R-Virginia. Comey, represented by Dechert partners David Kelley and Vincent Cohen, argued the closed-door questioning proposed by the House committee would fuel partisan narratives and selective leaks.
Judge Trevor McFadden, who was appointed by President Donald Trump last year to the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, oversaw the case.
“Mr. Comey asks this court's intervention not to avoid giving testimony but to prevent the Joint Committee from using the pretext of a closed interview to peddle a distorted, partisan political narrative about the Clinton and Russian investigations through selective leaks,” Comey's lawyers wrote in their motion to quash the subpoena. They added: “The public record shows members of the Joint Committee leaking what suits them and maintaining the secrecy only of what does not.”
Comey's attorneys said he would “welcome the opportunity to testify in a public setting concerning the Russia and Clinton investigations.”
The legal team for the House, led by Thomas Hungar, the general counsel, argued in a court filing Friday that history was not on Comey's side.
“Mr. Comey brazenly demands that this Court issue an order quashing a congressional subpoena directed to him—a request for relief so extraordinary and frivolous that, as far as undersigned counsel is aware, no district court in the history of the Republic has ever granted such a request,” Hungar wrote. The House lawyers added: “Try as he might, Mr. Comey may not condition his cooperation with a congressional investigation on the presence of television cameras.”
During a hearing Friday, Kelley argued that the House was using the closed-door process “both as a sword and a shield,” hoping to take “shots in a dark alley” at Comey and then selectively leak to the media to show the public what Republican lawmakers “want them to see.”
“They just want to zero-in and gang up and do it in a non-public way,” Kelley added later in the Friday afternoon hearing.
Hungar said no rule forbids Comey from speaking publicly about his testimony in what amounts to a deposition by lawmakers and House staff.
“That makes absolutely no sense whatsoever,” Hungar said Friday, responding to the claim that Comey would be forbidden from publicly discussing his closed-door testimony. “Mr. Comey has ample opportunity to express his views.”
President Trump fired Comey last year amid claims he inappropriately handled the investigation of Hillary Clinton's use of personal email for official government purposes.
Trump appointed former King & Spalding partner Christopher Wray to replace Comey as the FBI's leader.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
Auditor Finds 'Significant Deficiency' in FTC Accounting to Tune of $7M
4 minute readTexas Court Invalidates SEC’s Dealer Rule, Siding with Crypto Advocates
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Litera Acquires Document Automation Startup Offices & Dragons
- 2Patent Trolls Come Under Increasing Fire in Federal Courts
- 3Transforming Dispute Processes in Law: The Impact of Large Language Models
- 4Daniel Habib to Serve as Next Attorney-in-Charge of NY Federal Defender Appeals Unit
- 5Protecting Attorney-Client Privilege in the Modern Age of Communications
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250