Dreeben Takes Break from Mueller Team to Argue Before Supreme Court
Deputy U.S. Solicitor General Michael Dreeben will detour from special counsel Robert Mueller's legal team next week to argue before the U.S. Supreme Court in high-profile privacy case.
November 21, 2017 at 04:57 PM
3 minute read
Michael Dreeben, deputy solicitor general at the US Department of Justice. Photo by Diego M. Radzinsdhi.
Deputy U.S. Solicitor General Michael Dreeben will detour from special counsel Robert Mueller's legal team next week to argue before the U.S. Supreme Court in high-profile privacy case.
The Justice Department's top expert on criminal law cases will argue in Carpenter v. United States on Nov. 29 that police collection of cellphone data does not constitute a search of defendant Timothy Carpenter, accused of armed robbery of cellphones, and does not violate the Fourth Amendment.
Dreeben was recruited by Mueller in June to assist with the probe into Russian connections with the Trump campaign. The department made it clear from the outset that Dreeben was not working with Mueller fulltime but would continue to tend to the high court's criminal docket when he could.
A spokesman for Mueller's office issued this statement: “Michael Dreeben is working on legal issues as a counselor in the Special Counsel's Office, while retaining certain responsibilities as deputy solicitor general to ensure continuity of representation of the United States in the Supreme Court.”
With more than 100 Supreme Court arguments under his belt, Dreeben is an expert on “search and seizure” issues in the modern era, arguing in cases like Maryland v. King in 2013 on whether DNA swabs by police of criminal suspects also violated the Fourth Amendment.
The Carpenter case “could be the most important case involving privacy” in decades, National Constitution Center president Jeffrey Rosen said at a recent discussion of the case.
Elizabeth Prelogar, another lawyer in the solicitor general's office who was detailed to the Mueller team, also surfaced at a November 14 Harvard Law School discussion that included Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. Roberts was at the school to preside over the Ames Moot Court Competition.
Adam Jed, an appellate lawyer in the Justice Department's civil division who is also one of the roughly 20 lawyers in the Mueller team, argued a case before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit on November 13.
At an April 2016 event marking Dreeben's 100th argument, justices heaped praise on him as a lawyer who did not bend precedents or statutes to fit his arguments. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said that when she sees Dreeben at the lectern, “I know he will tell it straight.” Smiling, Ginsburg also said there was another reason he liked Dreeben: “You have never called me Justice O'Connor!”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSupreme Court Justices Have 'Variety of Views' on Ethics, Kagan Says
Can Congress Tax Unrealized Gains as Income? Supreme Court May Decide
This Judge, Who Grew up in Miami-Dade, Just Had a Street Named After Her
Court Overturns $185M Fee Award for Quinn Emanuel in ACA Litigation
Trending Stories
- 1Business Breakups: Why Business and Commercial Cases Are Well-Suited to Mediation
- 2Prosecutors Drop Charges Against Ex-Miami Commissioner and Attorney
- 3Pennsylvania Modernizes Trust Administration With New Directed Trust Statute
- 4Farella Hires Former AUSA, Jan. 6 Prosecutor
- 5Dougherty Jury Returns $2M Verdict
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250