Limiting Scope of 'Class Standing' Doctrine in RMBS Cases
In their Second Circuit Review, Martin Flumenbaum and Brad S. Karp discuss a recent decision that resolved two matters relating to residential mortgage backed securities on which district courts have been divided: the scope of the Trust Indenture Act of 1939 and a named plaintiff's standing to assert breach-of-duty claims against an RMBS trustee on behalf of absent class members who had invested in trusts other than those in which the named plaintiff had invested.
January 27, 2015 at 09:36 PM
12 minute read
This month, we discuss Retirement Board v. The Bank of New York Mellon,1 in which the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit resolved two matters relating to residential mortgage backed securities (RMBS) on which district courts have been divided. In a decision written by Judge Debra A. Livingston and joined by Judge Dennis Jacobs and Judge José A. Cabranes, the court held that a named plaintiff in a putative class action does not have standing to assert breach-of-duty claims against an RMBS trustee on behalf of absent class members who had invested in trusts other than those in which the named plaintiff had invested.
The court also addressed the scope of the Trust Indenture Act of 1939 (TIA). Where applicable, the TIA obligates a trustee to disclose information relating to the securities underlying the trust, among other things. As a matter of first impression, the court held that the TIA does not apply to RMBS trusts governed by pooling and servicing agreements (PSAs). Accordingly, the court affirmed in part and reversed in part the district court order, remanding the case for further proceedings consistent with its opinion.
Background
Retirement Board concerned 530 RMBS trusts created between 2004 and 2008. Most of the trusts were governed by PSAs and organized under New York law. In general, RMBS trusts are organized to receive the stream of payments generated by mortgage loans and to redistribute the revenue to investors or “certificateholders.” Mortgage lenders sell pools of mortgages into the trust, and investors then purchase certificates representing the right to a share of the revenue. These certificates are often divided into different classes or tranches. The trustee typically hires a mortgage servicer to oversee and administer the mortgages.
The Bank of New York Mellon (BNYM) acts as trustee for all 530 RMBS trusts at issue in this case. Countrywide Home Loans and its affiliates (collectively, “Countrywide”) originated all of the underlying mortgage loans, sold those loans to the trusts, and acted as the mortgage servicer for the trust. In the process, Countrywide made a number of representations and warranties about the loans' characteristics, credit quality, and underwriting. The PSAs required BNYM both to ensure that the loans were properly documented and to provide notice to Countrywide if it became aware of a material breach. Upon notice, Countrywide was obligated either to cure the defect or to repurchase the defective loan.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1A&O Shearman Adopts 3-Level Lockstep Pay Model Amid Shift to All-Equity Partnership
- 2A RICO Surge Is Underway: Here's How the Allstate Push Might Play Out
- 3The Law Firm Disrupted: Playing the Talent Game to Win
- 4Data-Driven Legal Strategies
- 5Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250