Ruling Broadens Duty of Disclosure in Securities Filing
In their Second Circuit Review column, Martin Flumenbaum and Brad S. Karp discuss 'Stratte-McClure v. Morgan Stanley,' in which the court concluded as a matter of first impression for this circuit that Item 303 of Regulation S-K imposes a duty of disclosure on a company filing a Form 10-Q which, under certain circumstances, may give rise to liability under Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5.
February 23, 2015 at 08:36 PM
10 minute read
This month, we discuss Stratte-McClure v. Morgan Stanley,1 in which the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed an order granting defendants' motion to dismiss. In its decision, written by Judge Debra Ann Livingston and joined by Judge Jose A. Cabranes and Judge Richard C. Wesley, the court concluded as a matter of first impression for this circuit that Item 303 of Regulation S-K imposes a duty of disclosure on a company filing a Form 10-Q which, under certain circumstances, may give rise to liability under Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5. This decision creates a split with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Background
Lead plaintiffs State-Boston Retirement System and Fjarde AP-Fonden brought a putative securities fraud class action under Sections 10(b) and 20(a), 15 U.S.C. §§78j(b) & 78t(a), of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for losses that they said they sustained when Morgan Stanley and six of its officers and former officers allegedly made material misstatements and omissions during the class period. Plaintiffs alleged that defendants made these misstatements and omissions to try to conceal Morgan Stanley's exposure to and losses from the subprime mortgage market.
Plaintiffs claimed that Morgan Stanley did not properly disclose in its 10-Q filings that the company (1) held a long position in a massive proprietary trade involving the purchase and sale of credit default swaps on collateralized debt obligations backed by mezzanine tranches of subprime residential mortgage-backed securities; (2) had sustained losses on that position in the second and third quarters of 2007; and (3) was likely to incur additional significant losses on the position in the future.
Item 303 of Regulation S-K requires companies to disclose on their 10-Q filings (and other SEC-mandated filings) any “known trends, or uncertainties that have had or that the registrant reasonably expects will have a material…unfavorable impact” on net sales or revenues or income from continuing operations.”2
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1A&O Shearman Adopts 3-Level Lockstep Pay Model Amid Shift to All-Equity Partnership
- 2A RICO Surge Is Underway: Here's How the Allstate Push Might Play Out
- 3The Law Firm Disrupted: Playing the Talent Game to Win
- 4Data-Driven Legal Strategies
- 5Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250