High-Frequency Trading: Enforcement Trends Emerge
In his Corporate Crime column, William F. Johnson, a partner at King & Spalding, writes: A review of recent actions related to high-frequency trading confirms the uncertainty of the role of law enforcement, but also suggests an emerging trend.
March 04, 2015 at 09:22 PM
14 minute read
High-Frequency Trading (HFT) remains one of the most hotly debated subjects in the securities industry, perhaps accelerated by Michael Lewis's 2014 best-selling book “Flash Boys,” which profiled some of the players involved in HFT.1 As is often the case, Congress has now joined the debate; Sen. Carl Levin scheduled a hearing on HFT before the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations (PSI).2 The role of law enforcement in HFT is prominent on the list of debated issues. In a letter to the PSI, Mary Jo White, Chair of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, emphasized the difficulty of assessing HFT's impact on capital markets because of “limitations on available data.”3 Until recently, law enforcement in the HFT space has been spotty and without any apparent pattern, which may be the result of an uncertainty about the proper role of enforcement and the difficulty, hinted at in Chair White's letter, of devising a targeted HFT enforcement program. But patterns are beginning to appear.
A review of recent actions related to HFT confirms the uncertainty of the role of law enforcement, but also suggests an emerging trend. On the one hand, many of the enforcement actions have centered on “spoofing” and similar stock manipulation schemes. But, in these cases, the manipulative scheme itself is not new at all; it is only being carried out with the assistance of the latest technological devices. For that reason, it is questionable whether these cases genuinely relate to HFT and therefore whether they are relevant to the debate surrounding its proper role in market structure and access. On the other hand, although some of the actions against trading platforms also reflect uncertainty about enforcement priorities, some trends have begun to emerge in the areas of disclosure and equitable treatment of market participants. The New York Attorney General's (NYAG) suit against Barclays Capital4 fits this profile, but also presents novel theories about trading platform liability under New York's broad anti-fraud law, the Martin Act.5 In the coming year, we will see how the law is developed in these existing cases and whether new enforcement actions continue to follow the recent trend or whether additional areas of focus emerge.
Traders
Enforcement actions against individual high-frequency traders have been relatively limited and generally unremarkable. These cases have been almost singularly focused on punishing classic stock manipulation schemes that have been carried out using modern HFT technology. Therefore, these actions are neither surprising nor particularly illustrative in assessing law enforcement trends focused on HFT or the value of its role in the markets.
“Spoofing” or “layering” is the most common scheme employed by individual traders that law enforcement has targeted over the last year. Spoofing involves generating multiple trade orders (without an intent to execute) in order to manipulate securities by creating perception of demand. As an example, an offending trader will first place a small, bona fide order to buy or sell a stock. The trader then immediately places a large, non-bona fide order or series of orders on the opposite side (to sell or buy, respectively) to create the appearance of significant market interest. Once other traders execute the manipulator's initial bona fide order in anticipation of the large, opposite order, they will find that the manipulator has already canceled it. Typically spoofers will repeat the process, moving the price up and down, taking small gains in each direction without ever holding a substantial net position.6 The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) alleged that trader Michael Coscia deployed this exact strategy in the futures markets, according to an administrative proceeding settled in 2013.7 In 2014, after the public controversy surrounding HFT had grown, the U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois charged Coscia with six counts of commodities fraud8 and six counts of spoofing.9
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Nicholas M. DePalma and Christian R. Schreiber of Venable have stepped in to represent CP Management Services, CRS RB4 Holdings and other defendants in a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The suit was filed Aug. 30 in Virginia Eastern District Court by Greenberg Traurig on behalf of Daito Kentaku USA. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Claude M. Hilton, is 1:24-cv-01538, Daito Kentaku USA, LLC v. Comstock Partners, LC.
Who Got The Work
Wyatt, Tarrant & Combs partner Andrew J. Pulliam has entered an appearance for Steve Jensen in a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The action, filed Aug. 30 in Tennessee Middle District Court by the Law Office of Perry A. Craft on behalf of Timothy Robins, accuses the defendant of writing a worthless check for over $94,000 for the sale of auctioned goods. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Eli J. Richardson, is 3:24-cv-01064, Robins v. Jensen et al.
Who Got The Work
Lane Powell shareholder Pilar C. French has entered an appearance for Penney OpCo LLC in a pending consumer class action. The complaint, filed Aug. 26 in Oregon District Court by Hattis & Lukacs, alleges that the company markets fictional discounts for certain products. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai, is 6:24-cv-01414, Gamble v. Penney OpCo LLC.
Who Got The Work
Donald L. Carmelite and Coryn D. Hubbert of Marshall Dennehey have stepped in to defend the City of York, Detective Roland Comacho and Detective Lisa Daniels in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 27 in Pennsylvania Middle District Court by Levin & Zeiger on behalf of Noel Matos Montalvo, seeks damages for the amount of time that Montalvo was incarcerated over five years for the exonerated killing of his common law wife. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jennifer P. Wilson, is 1:24-cv-01459, Montalvo v. City of York, et al.
Who Got The Work
Joseph M. Englert, Brian E. Pumphrey and M. Laughlin Allen of McGuireWoods have entered appearances for Bank of America NA in a pending class action. The action was filed Aug. 26 in Georgia Northern District Court by Podhurst Orseck; Webb, Klase & Lemond; Crabtree & Auslander; and Morrison + Associates on behalf of the representative of the beneficiaries of the Arthur N. Weinraub Trust, a trust which contains residential real property. The suit accuses the defendant of overcharging the trust by selecting unnecessary and/or excessively priced insurance for the property. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Thomas W. Thrash Jr., is 1:24-cv-03780, Weinraub v. Bank of America, N.A.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250